Problems with carbon dating answers in genesis
These 3 methods can be checked against each other, especially using the Concordia line/diagram.Jim Mason made no reference to the Concordia line and I could not find any reference to the Concordia line on any articles on the CMI website, even though it is well known (e.g. Jim raised the issue of Helium concentrations in Zircon.
Geologists now recognize that granites formed very rapidly, which is consistent with the biblical scenario.
To make such a claim, one would need to know independently and unarguably just what the age of the Earth actually is.
I submit that there is no such independently and unarguably known age—unless one is prepared to accept the age that is derived from the Bible, that was provided to us by God, an eyewitness, and some reliable scribes.
He has equipment at the University of Adelaide and does the dating analysis himself.
Thus he has the knowledge of an experienced practitioner and is not just an armchair theoretician.